Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner (SANE) A Practice Exam 2025 - Free SANE Practice Questions and Study Guide

Causation is often the most challenging aspect of negligence to establish because it requires a direct link between the breach of duty and the damages incurred by the plaintiff. In legal terms, a plaintiff must demonstrate that the defendant's actions (or lack thereof) were not only a contributing factor but also a proximate cause of the injuries sustained. This involves a nuanced analysis of whether the harm would have occurred "but for" the defendant's actions or if the actions were a significant factor in bringing about the injury.

In many cases, multiple potential causes may exist for the harm suffered, making it difficult to pinpoint that one specific action or inaction directly resulted in the damages. Additionally, establishing causation might involve complex medical or scientific evidence that requires expert testimony. This intricacy is why determining causation often poses a greater challenge compared to the other elements of negligence, which are generally more straightforward to demonstrate based on the nature of the circumstances. For instance, the presence of damages can usually be easily identified as losses incurred by the plaintiff, while duty and breach of duty can often be assessed based on established legal standards and norms. This combination of factors makes causation a critical yet intricate aspect of proving negligence.